If you have heard the notion that science supports evolution please take a look at this article. Here we will learn that evolution is not science but a point of view that requires faith similar to religion.
Long before Charles Darwin arrived to the planet true scientists were asking honest questions about their environment and putting together a system that would allow them to answer those questions. Not only would those questions be answered, but the answers could be repeated. True science uses the scientific method. One of the basic requirements is that the results can be shown over and over. Evolution fails at this point and can not be supported by the scientific method. It is therefore unscientific.
With the sad occurrence of what many call "Climategate" it is easily seen that scientists are sometimes not interested in science. Instead they would rather trust in their own biased faith, also known as a "belief system". This is the opposite of what science is all about, but similar to religion. If absolute truth is real, what a person believes about that absolute truth is not the proof. The proof is that the absolute truth is self-evident all by itself. Since there are no worthy examples to show the world that evolution is repeatable, it can not be classified this way but is instead a "belief system" with men and women who are similar to priests and priestesses.
The scientific method relies on observations. From these observations come predictions. Darwin made observations with predictions that really have no proof. Why ? Because the scientific method also requires that experiments be accomplished. As of yet, none have been accomplished, which makes evolution a theory, and not yet a fact. Science is interested in discovering facts, it is a fact-finding mission. A man can find facts all around him, but to produce experiments that prove his beliefs about those facts is the crux of science. This is not found in the belief of evolution. No animal or rock or any other thing has been observed changing into a different species.
Chaos has never been proved to bring about order. A system requires order and evolution is said to have come from chaos, which is against science and plain common sense. This means that evolution takes a great amount of faith to believe in. Entropy is a scientific law, proven in experiment after experiment. Evolution goes against this basic law of science, which makes this another reason evolution is against science and unscientific.
As evolution becomes more unpopular people are realizing just how silly it is to believe that everything came from nothing. People use to believe that the world was flat. If you disagreed with them you were to be ridiculed. Now we can see plainly, even from our own PC, that the world is very round. Satellites show us this. It is a repeatable fact. Evolution claims that living things came from non-living things. Common sense tells us that if something can not be repeated, it can not be scientific. Let us go forth with the five senses we have and advance society by making sure student and teacher alike realize the unworthiness of evolution to be called science.
Lesson: Science is repeatable according to the scientific method.